Continuous Manufacturing in the Cosmetics Industry

Continuous manufacturing is a production method in which raw materials are fed into the process and products are output uninterrupted, 24/7. Unlike traditional batch processes (where ingredients are mixed in discrete lots and each batch is completed before starting the next), continuous flow processes move material steadily through mixers, reactors, and other equipment without stops. The result is a steady, high-volume output of essentially uniform product.

For cosmetics (liquid and semi-solid products like lotions, creams, shampoos, etc.), continuous manufacturing means moving from “dozens of separate batch tanks” to integrated, modular lines that handle mixing, heating/cooling, emulsifying and filling in one unbroken sequence. This approach has been shown in other industries to greatly improve production efficiency and reduce facility footprint.

For example, one analysis notes that continuous processing “eliminates the need for pauses between runs,” enabling much higher throughput, more consistent product, and lower energy and time per unit than batch.

While the cosmetics industry still relies heavily on batch methods (for flexibility and small runs), leading companies are exploring and implementing continuous approaches in areas like high-volume hair care and body products.

Recent R&D projects even demonstrate fully continuous production of novel ingredients – for example scientists at the University of Bath developed a scalable continuous process to make biodegradable cellulose microbeads (a cosmetic exfoliant) by forcing a cellulose solution through micro-nozzles into oil, collecting the formed beads without batching steps.

---

Equipment, Process Flow, and Technologies

Continuous cosmetic production uses many of the same unit operations as batch, but they are linked into skid-mounted, flow-through systems with extensive automation. Mixers and emulsifiers are designed for continuous flow: for example, high-shear rotor–stator mixers or homogenizers keep emulsions uniformly suspended as material passes through.

The skids often include heating and cooling jackets, static mixers, pumps and valves, all arranged to minimize hold-up volume. Crucially, continuous systems integrate sensors and control loops at each stage. Inline sensors (for temperature, pressure, flow rate) and analytical PAT instruments (e.g. NIR or Raman probes for composition, or viscometers for rheology) continuously monitor product quality.

This real-time data feeds into programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and HMIs that adjust process variables on the fly. In practice, a cosmetics skid might measure viscosity and pH continuously, adjusting shear or additive flow to keep the product within spec.

As Bruker explains, “continuous processes generally cannot operate without the continual, real-time assurance of product quality,” so Process Analytical Technology (PAT) is key to making continuous manufacturing feasible.

Modern continuous lines are built as modular process skids. Each skid is a self-contained unit mounted on a frame, integrating vessels, mixers, pumps, sensors and controls.

For example, EPIC Systems describes a modular skid as “a self-contained process system… built into a frame,” which can include entire process trains (mixing, heating, dosing).

In cosmetics this means skids are designed to meet hygienic standards (all stainless-steel, CIP/SIP capable, smooth tri-clamp fittings) and can be easily reconfigured.

The modularity allows processors to add or remove sections (e.g. an extra mixer or reactor) to scale capacity or switch products. Skids also simplify installation: they are assembled and tested off-site, then plugged into the plant, shortening start-up time.

Sanitary skid design ensures full Clean-In-Place (CIP) capability so lines can be cleaned without dismantling, reducing downtime and cross-contamination risk.

Other advanced features found in continuous cosmetic lines include flow reactors or static mixers for chemical additions, precision dosing pumps, and automated valves for switching flows. Many continuous systems are enclosed and inerted (for oxidation-sensitive materials).

The entire line is managed by a distributed control system (DCS) or PLC network, often linked to a Manufacturing Execution System (MES) for traceability and data logging.

In sum, continuous cosmetic manufacturing relies on integrated automation and inline analytics: temperature, viscosity, pH and concentration are monitored and controlled in real time, whereas traditional batch systems test quality only at discrete points.

By blending process equipment (mixers, pumps, heat exchangers) with sensors, PAT, and PLCs on modular skids, the system achieves uninterrupted production with consistent control of every parameter.

---

Industry Examples and Case Studies

Leading personal-care manufacturers have begun adopting continuous or semi-continuous methods in pilot or production units.

A notable example is Unilever’s massive Dubai plant (opened 2016). This $272 M facility was built with a “cutting-edge continuous production technology” that Unilever says cuts the production cycle by 90%.

The plant’s lines use a modular design and advanced automation to run 24/7, achieve higher throughput, and automate quality checks (scanning 350 bottles/minute).

Unilever reports the plant uses solar power and extensive recycling (80% of wastewater reused), reflecting how continuous design can tie into sustainability goals.

Such examples show how a fully optimized continuous line can drastically increase output (the Dubai plant targets 100,000 t/year) while reducing labor and idle time.

On the research side, L’Oréal and others have investigated on-demand manufacturing and advanced filling but published examples of L’Oréal or P&G using truly continuous reaction/extrusion lines are scarce.

One interesting development is a P&G patent on a “late-stage product differentiation” process. This approach makes a common base formula continuously, then adds final specialty ingredients (scents, colors) just before packaging.

P&G notes this hybrid method can cut downtime and blend efficiency, effectively combining continuous base production with batch-like flexibility. Although not a full-scale case study, it illustrates how leading companies are exploring ways to merge continuous and batch benefits.

Smaller innovators are also active. Researchers at the University of Bath (in partnership with industry) developed a continuous emulsion process for making biodegradable microbeads as an eco-friendly scrub ingredient.

They use a membrane dispersion technique to force a cellulose solution through nozzles into oil, creating uniform microspheres in a nonstop flow. This pilot work shows continuous methods can be applied even to niche cosmetic ingredients, enabling consistent quality and easier scale-up.

In contract manufacturing, experts note that batch vs continuous is chosen by product demand: batch lines give flexibility, continuous lines give volume.

For example, Hale Cosmeceuticals (a CMO) explains that “batch production… allows for flexibility in formulations and customization,” whereas “continuous production… is used for high-demand items, ensuring a steady output of popular products.”

In practice, many large brands use a mix: they run new or specialized products on batch units (where formulas change often) and high-volume staples (lotions, shampoos) on continuous or semi-continuous lines.

---

Continuous vs. Batch Processing: A Comparison

---

The Future of Continuous Manufacturing in Cosmetics

Within the next 5–10 years, continuous manufacturing will move from pilot-scale demonstrations into more mainstream adoption for cosmetics, especially in:

1. High-volume products (like shampoos, body washes, lotions, deodorants, sunscreens) where process efficiency and consistency give a clear cost advantage.

2. Active-loaded products (like serums or sunscreens with multiple UV filters) where precise dosing, uniformity, and scalability are critical.

3. Sustainability-driven operations, since continuous processes often consume less energy, water, and packaging, aligning with ESG goals.

What’s slowing it down right now are equipment costs, lack of modular flexibility, and the fact that cosmetics companies often reformulate or launch new SKUs quickly, making batch processing more convenient.

But as Industry 4.0, AI-driven process control, and modular skid systems become cheaper and more adaptable, continuous processes will fit even with frequent product changeovers.

---

Cosmetic Segments Likely to Adopt Continuous First

1. High-volume personal care — Shampoos, conditioners, body washes, and liquid soaps. These products have relatively simple formulations and stable emulsions, making them good candidates for continuous mixers and homogenizers.

2. Roll-ons and deodorants — High demand and repetitive production cycles. Continuous mixing and filling can significantly reduce downtime.

3. Sunscreens & skincare with actives — Require tight control over actives dosing (UV filters, retinoids, niacinamide). Continuous lines with inline PAT (Process Analytical Technology) can ensure dose accuracy and avoid batch-to-batch variability.

4. Hair color & bleaching products — Need strict consistency to avoid uneven results. Continuous dosing and mixing ensure product uniformity.

5. Toothpaste & oral care — High-volume, relatively stable formulations that benefit from continuous vacuum mixing and extrusion.

---

Technical Hurdles That Need Solving

1. Flexibility & SKU diversity
   Cosmetics companies frequently launch new variants (fragrance, color, texture changes). Continuous systems must be modular and easy to clean/changeover to be practical.

2. Shear- and temperature-sensitive ingredients
   Some polymers, encapsulated actives, and natural extracts may degrade in continuous systems. Equipment design must allow gentle yet consistent processing.

3. Inline quality control (PAT)
   Unlike pharma, cosmetics don’t yet have widespread PAT adoption. Real-time viscosity, particle size, and color measurements are still developing for cosmetic matrices.

4. Regulatory & consumer push
   Since cosmetics aren’t as strictly regulated as pharma, there’s less external pressure. Adoption will be driven more by cost savings, speed-to-market, and sustainability branding.

---

Sources

• Batch Process vs Continuous Process: Key Differences and Benefits

• Exploring Continuous Pharmaceutical Manufacturing vs. Batch Processing

• iese.edu

• Scientists make biodegradable microbeads from cellulose

• Cosmetics Process Skids: Applications, Features, Benefits

• Cosmetics Process Skid Manufacturers: Hygienic Processing

• PAT for Continuous Processing | Bruker

• What are Modular Process Skids? – EPIC Systems Group

• Unilever Opens $272m Manufacturing Plant in Dubai

• P&G Patents “Late Stage Product Differentiation Process” | Happi

• Breaking Down the Supply Chain Process in Cosmetic Contract Manufacturing

• Sustainability by Reduced Energy Consumption during Manufacturing: The Case of Cosmetic Emulsions